NEON
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
38.1M
111 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLXS
Price
$139.66
Change
-$6.58 (-4.50%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.76B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEON vs PLXS

Header iconNEON vs PLXS Comparison
Open Charts NEON vs PLXSBanner chart's image
Neonode
Price$2.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$278.68K
Capitalization38.1M
Plexus
Price$139.66
Change-$6.58 (-4.50%)
Volume$134.54K
Capitalization3.76B
NEON vs PLXS Comparison Chart in %
NEON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEON vs. PLXS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEON is a Hold and PLXS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NEON: $2.27 vs. PLXS: $139.66)
Brand notoriety: NEON and PLXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEON: 31% vs. PLXS: 69%
Market capitalization -- NEON: $38.1M vs. PLXS: $3.76B
NEON [@Electronic Components] is valued at $38.1M. PLXS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $3.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $165.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEON’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLXS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLXS is a better buy in the long-term than NEON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEON’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLXS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEON is a better buy in the short-term than PLXS.

Price Growth

NEON (@Electronic Components) experienced а -2.58% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was -2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEON is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.60% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLXS($3.76B) has a higher market cap than NEON($38.1M). PLXS has higher P/E ratio than NEON: PLXS (22.27) vs NEON (4.45). PLXS YTD gains are higher at: -6.544 vs. NEON (-72.418). PLXS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 277M vs. NEON (-6.69M). PLXS has more cash in the bank: 238M vs. NEON (13.2M). NEON has less debt than PLXS: NEON (485K) vs PLXS (174M). PLXS has higher revenues than NEON: PLXS (4.03B) vs NEON (2.61M).
NEONPLXSNEON / PLXS
Capitalization38.1M3.76B1%
EBITDA-6.69M277M-2%
Gain YTD-72.418-6.5441,107%
P/E Ratio4.4522.2720%
Revenue2.61M4.03B0%
Total Cash13.2M238M6%
Total Debt485K174M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEON vs PLXS: Fundamental Ratings
NEON
PLXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9762
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4989
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a7

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEON's Valuation (39) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as PLXS (60) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (97) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (98) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s over the last 12 months.

NEON's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLXS (89) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEONPLXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBLAX12.900.03
+0.23%
Franklin Managed Income A
AFGGX20.460.03
+0.15%
Yorktown Growth A
ROFCX12.810.01
+0.08%
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity Consult
FOCPX24.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity OTC
LRSCX14.98-0.01
-0.07%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value A

NEON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEON and OSIS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEON and OSIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEON
1D Price
Change %
NEON100%
-0.87%
OSIS - NEON
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
TEL - NEON
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
GLW - NEON
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
ALNT - NEON
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
PLXS - NEON
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
More

PLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLXS
1D Price
Change %
PLXS100%
+1.68%
BHE - PLXS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
FLEX - PLXS
71%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
KN - PLXS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
CTS - PLXS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
JBL - PLXS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More