Advertisement
NEOJF vs XROLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEOJF is a Hold and XROLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NEOJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
XROLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- XROLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
NEOJF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +86.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.69% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| NEOJF | XROLF | NEOJF / XROLF | |
| Capitalization | 170M | 16.9B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 2.81B | 697M | 402% |
| Gain YTD | 19.235 | -2.109 | -912% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.42 | 119.72 | 13% |
| Revenue | 7.87B | 1.91B | 412% |
| Total Cash | 6.16B | 2.12B | 291% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.22B | - |
XROLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NEOJF | XROLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCOR | 42.04 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bd ETF | |||
| GEMD | 42.26 | 0.08 | +0.20% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Emrg Mkts USD BdETF | |||
| VGUS | 75.56 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | |||
| DFAT | 56.62 | -1.02 | -1.77% |
| Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | |||
| SETM | 28.43 | -0.88 | -3.00% |
| Sprott Critical Materials ETF | |||
NEOJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and PXPHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and PXPHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEOJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEOJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PXPHF - NEOJF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLVFF - NEOJF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XROLF - NEOJF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EAGRF - NEOJF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRGE - NEOJF | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.14% | ||
More | ||||
XROLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XROLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XROLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRGT - XROLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| ATEN - XROLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| NEOJF - XROLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRYBF - XROLF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| XBP - XROLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -8.62% | ||
More | ||||