NEOJF
Price
$11.53
Change
+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
173.68M
TENB
Price
$28.59
Change
-$0.40 (-1.38%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.51B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEOJF vs TENB

Header iconNEOJF vs TENB Comparison
Open Charts NEOJF vs TENBBanner chart's image
NEOJAPAN
Price$11.53
Change+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Volume$200
Capitalization173.68M
Tenable Holdings
Price$28.59
Change-$0.40 (-1.38%)
Volume$14.19K
Capitalization3.51B
NEOJF vs TENB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TENB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEOJF vs. TENB commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEOJF is a Hold and TENB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (NEOJF: $11.53 vs. TENB: $28.99)
Brand notoriety: NEOJF and TENB are both not notable
NEOJF represents the Packaged Software, while TENB is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEOJF: 94% vs. TENB: 66%
Market capitalization -- NEOJF: $173.68M vs. TENB: $3.51B
NEOJF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $173.68M. TENB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $3.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEOJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTENB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TENB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEOJF is a better buy in the long-term than TENB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEOJF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TENB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEOJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TENB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEOJF is a better buy in the short-term than TENB.

Price Growth

NEOJF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TENB (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

TENB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.09% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.92% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TENB($3.51B) has a higher market cap than NEOJF($174M). NEOJF YTD gains are higher at: 19.235 vs. TENB (-26.384). NEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. TENB (40.2M). NEOJF has higher revenues than TENB: NEOJF (7.26B) vs TENB (923M).
NEOJFTENBNEOJF / TENB
Capitalization174M3.51B5%
EBITDA2.36B40.2M5,878%
Gain YTD19.235-26.384-73%
P/E Ratio15.40N/A-
Revenue7.26B923M787%
Total CashN/A460M-
Total DebtN/A417M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TENB: Fundamental Ratings
TENB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEOJFTENB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TENB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPYIX9.040.05
+0.56%
PIMCO RAE International Instl
TPLNX18.810.06
+0.32%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value A
PRJBX46.160.13
+0.28%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R2
HUMDX15.810.01
+0.06%
Huber Mid Cap Value Inv
GAUIX5.83-0.01
-0.17%
Gabelli Utilities I

NEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEOJF
1D Price
Change %
NEOJF100%
N/A
LIDR - NEOJF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
HUBC - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+11.55%
RELY - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
TENB - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
CFLT - NEOJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
More

TENB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TENB has been loosely correlated with QLYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TENB jumps, then QLYS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TENB
1D Price
Change %
TENB100%
-1.46%
QLYS - TENB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PANW - TENB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
VRNS - TENB
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
PTC - TENB
52%
Loosely correlated
-4.77%
CRWD - TENB
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More