NEOJF
Price
$11.53
Change
+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
173.68M
RELY
Price
$19.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.92B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEOJF vs RELY

Header iconNEOJF vs RELY Comparison
Open Charts NEOJF vs RELYBanner chart's image
NEOJAPAN
Price$11.53
Change+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Volume$200
Capitalization173.68M
Remitly Global
Price$19.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$130.73K
Capitalization3.92B
NEOJF vs RELY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RELY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEOJF vs. RELY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEOJF is a Hold and RELY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (NEOJF: $11.53 vs. RELY: $19.00)
Brand notoriety: NEOJF and RELY are both not notable
NEOJF represents the Packaged Software, while RELY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEOJF: 94% vs. RELY: 181%
Market capitalization -- NEOJF: $173.68M vs. RELY: $3.92B
NEOJF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $173.68M. RELY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $3.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEOJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRELY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RELY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEOJF is a better buy in the long-term than RELY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEOJF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RELY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEOJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RELY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RELY is a better buy in the short-term than NEOJF.

Price Growth

NEOJF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RELY (@Computer Communications) price change was +20.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

RELY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.09% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.93% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RELY($3.92B) has a higher market cap than NEOJF($174M). RELY has higher P/E ratio than NEOJF: RELY (316.67) vs NEOJF (15.40). NEOJF YTD gains are higher at: 19.235 vs. RELY (-15.817). NEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. RELY (28.3M). NEOJF has higher revenues than RELY: NEOJF (7.26B) vs RELY (1.36B).
NEOJFRELYNEOJF / RELY
Capitalization174M3.92B4%
EBITDA2.36B28.3M8,350%
Gain YTD19.235-15.817-122%
P/E Ratio15.40316.675%
Revenue7.26B1.36B536%
Total CashN/A494M-
Total DebtN/A21.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RELY: Fundamental Ratings
RELY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEOJFRELY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RELY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPYIX9.040.05
+0.56%
PIMCO RAE International Instl
TPLNX18.810.06
+0.32%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value A
PRJBX46.160.13
+0.28%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R2
HUMDX15.810.01
+0.06%
Huber Mid Cap Value Inv
GAUIX5.83-0.01
-0.17%
Gabelli Utilities I

NEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEOJF
1D Price
Change %
NEOJF100%
N/A
LIDR - NEOJF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
HUBC - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+11.55%
RELY - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
TENB - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
CFLT - NEOJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
More

RELY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RELY has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RELY jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RELY
1D Price
Change %
RELY100%
+0.26%
PAYC - RELY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
QTWO - RELY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
RDVT - RELY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
TREIF - RELY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
HUBS - RELY
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
More