Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEMCX vs RNWHX
NEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts NEMCX vs RNWHX
Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq C
Price$25.33
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.5M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
NEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. NEMCX (225M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than NEMCX: RNWHX (0.93) vs NEMCX (0.00). NEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: NEMCX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). NEMCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). NEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs NEMCX (1000). NEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.16 vs. RNWHX (15.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. NEMCX (24.91).
| NEMCX | RNWHX | NEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.72 | 318% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 0.72 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.721 | 24.375 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.16 | 15.38 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 57.29 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.91 | 29.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers