Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEIAX vs RWMFX
NEIAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NEIAX vs RWMFX
Columbia Large Cap Index A
Price$53.83
Change-$6.31 (-10.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
NEIAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEIAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEIAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. NEIAX (3.07B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NEIAX: RWMFX (1.45) vs NEIAX (0.79). NEIAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NEIAX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NEIAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NEIAX (6.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEIAX: RWMFX (250) vs NEIAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. NEIAX (-9.05). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. NEIAX (-2.07).
| NEIAX | RWMFX | NEIAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.31 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.31 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.108 | 1.520 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.45 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.05 | 5.51 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 30.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.07 | 37.79 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 98.02 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement