Advertisement
NEGXF vs OSCR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEGXF is a Hold and OSCR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NEGXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NEGXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OSCR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NEGXF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NEGXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- OSCR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NEGXF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OSCR (@Managed Health Care) price change was -2.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
OSCR is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-0.69% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Managed Health Care (-0.36% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| NEGXF | OSCR | NEGXF / OSCR | |
| Capitalization | 20.8M | 4.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 3.12M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.000 | 11.086 | 361% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.95 | 34.55 | 69% |
| Revenue | 17.7M | 11.3B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.54M | 3.04B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 415K | 686M | 0% |
NEGXF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NEGXF | OSCR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
NEGXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEGXF and ALHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEGXF and ALHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEGXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALHC - NEGXF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| OSCR - NEGXF | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NEUE - NEGXF | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PFHO - NEGXF | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.54% |
OSCR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSCR has been loosely correlated with MOH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSCR jumps, then MOH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSCR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSCR | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| MOH - OSCR | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ELV - OSCR | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CLOV - OSCR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| HUM - OSCR | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CI - OSCR | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||