NEFB
Price
$399.95
Change
+$8.00 (+2.04%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
58.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NODB
Price
$59.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
151.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEFB vs NODB

Header iconNEFB vs NODB Comparison
Open Charts NEFB vs NODBBanner chart's image
Neffs Ban
Price$399.95
Change+$8.00 (+2.04%)
Volume$1
Capitalization58.17M
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$59.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization151.57M
NEFB vs NODB Comparison Chart in %
NEFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NODB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEFB vs. NODB commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEFB is a Hold and NODB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NEFB: $399.95 vs. NODB: $59.00)
Brand notoriety: NEFB and NODB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEFB: 2% vs. NODB: 27%
Market capitalization -- NEFB: $58.17M vs. NODB: $151.57M
NEFB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $58.17M. NODB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $151.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEFB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNODB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NEFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NODB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NEFB and NODB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEFB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEFB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NODB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NODB is a better buy in the short-term than NEFB.

Price Growth

NEFB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NODB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NODB($152M) has a higher market cap than NEFB($58.2M). NODB has higher P/E ratio than NEFB: NODB (37.58) vs NEFB (26.47). NEFB YTD gains are higher at: 95.086 vs. NODB (31.821). NEFB has less debt than NODB: NEFB (1.73M) vs NODB (5.45M). NODB has higher revenues than NEFB: NODB (41.7M) vs NEFB (10.2M).
NEFBNODBNEFB / NODB
Capitalization58.2M152M38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD95.08631.821299%
P/E Ratio26.4737.5870%
Revenue10.2M41.7M24%
Total CashN/A14.6M-
Total Debt1.73M5.45M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEFB vs NODB: Fundamental Ratings
NEFB
NODB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
8580
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEFB's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (89). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (100). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NEFB (85). This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to NEFB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (50). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (9). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEFBNODB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
16%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NODB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIAIF7.30N/A
N/A
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.
BMNM1.70N/A
N/A
Bimini Capital Management, Inc.
EIHDF0.36N/A
N/A
888 Holdings plc.
ESALF27.40N/A
N/A
Eisai Co., Ltd.
VAIAF52.75N/A
N/A
Vaisala OY

NEFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEFB and CBGPY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEFB and CBGPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEFB
1D Price
Change %
NEFB100%
N/A
CBGPY - NEFB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - NEFB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKY - NEFB
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - NEFB
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NODB - NEFB
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NODB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NODB and CWBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NODB and CWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODB
1D Price
Change %
NODB100%
N/A
CWBK - NODB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLBK - NODB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - NODB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More