Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RMFCX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$33.87
Change+$0.20 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.55M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NEAMX (38.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RMFCX (1.27) vs NEAMX (0.87). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NEAMX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NEAMX (12.13). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. NEAMX (10.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. NEAMX (50.72).
| NEAMX | RMFCX | NEAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.91 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.91 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.443 | 9.596 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.04 | 11.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.72 | 29.27 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.72 | 61.83 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.85 | 79.21 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement