Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
Price$56.71
Change+$1.34 (+2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NEAGX (1.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NEAGX (7.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 82.17 vs. WCMLX (1.99).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.99 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.79 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.612 | 7.621 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 44.4M | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.34 | -1.14 | -993% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.37 | 21.83 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.17 | 1.99 | 4,130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement