Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
Price$57.62
Change-$0.36 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. WCMLX (43.1M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NEAGX (1.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NEAGX (7.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.20 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 103.89 vs. WCMLX (4.74).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.99 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.79 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.557 | 6.454 | 380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 43.1M | 2,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.20 | -2.98 | -779% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.26 | 22.89 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.89 | 4.74 | 2,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 203.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement