Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
Price$64.10
Change+$6.15 (+10.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NEAGX (1.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NEAGX (7.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.14 vs. WCMLX (8.52). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 83.14 vs. WCMLX (-5.30).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.99 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.79 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.004 | 6.395 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 47.1M | 3,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.14 | 8.52 | 436% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.89 | 19.51 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.14 | -5.30 | -1,568% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement