Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$17.70
Change+$0.07 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. NDVVX (2.7B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.60) vs SSGSX (0.48). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.87). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. NDVVX (-9.26). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.26 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.025 | -1.034 | 293% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 5.31B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.48 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.26 | -8.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.83 | 1.10 | 804% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.60 | 18.06 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.88 | 18.76 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers