Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$18.23
Change+$0.22 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. NDVVX (2.69B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.59) vs SSGSX (0.48). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.87). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.19 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 17.40 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.26 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.943 | 0.582 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 5.18B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.48 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.19 | -13.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.47 | -7.65 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.40 | 4.92 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.94 | 17.51 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement