Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVAX vs SSGSX
NDVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVAX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value A
Price$17.22
Change-$0.28 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
NDVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. NDVAX (2.66B). NDVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVAX (1.30) vs SSGSX (0.49). NDVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVAX (14 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and NDVAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVAX (34.00). NDVAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NDVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVAX (-12.04) and SSGSX (-12.62) have marching annual gain over last year. NDVAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.85 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| NDVAX | SSGSX | NDVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.747 | -0.129 | 2,126% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 5.23B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.49 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.04 | -12.62 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.01 | -6.25 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.85 | 8.71 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.28 | 20.45 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement