NDLS
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.02 (-2.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.07M
54 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$44.93
Change
+$0.23 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.48B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NDLS vs YUMC

Header iconNDLS vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts NDLS vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Noodles & Company
Price$0.67
Change-$0.02 (-2.90%)
Volume$216.78K
Capitalization31.07M
Yum China Holdings
Price$44.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization16.48B
NDLS vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NDLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NDLS vs. YUMC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDLS is a Hold and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NDLS: $0.67 vs. YUMC: $44.93)
Brand notoriety: NDLS and YUMC are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NDLS: 122% vs. YUMC: 67%
Market capitalization -- NDLS: $31.07M vs. YUMC: $16.48B
NDLS [@Restaurants] is valued at $31.07M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NDLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NDLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the long-term than NDLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NDLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NDLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than NDLS.

Price Growth

NDLS (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.09% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

NDLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16.5B) has a higher market cap than NDLS($31.1M). NDLS YTD gains are higher at: 15.584 vs. YUMC (-5.249). NDLS has less debt than YUMC: NDLS (279M) vs YUMC (2.23B).
NDLSYUMCNDLS / YUMC
Capitalization31.1M16.5B0%
EBITDA-4.77MN/A-
Gain YTD15.584-5.249-297%
P/E RatioN/A18.57-
Revenue495MN/A-
Total Cash2.26MN/A-
Total Debt279M2.23B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDLS vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
NDLS
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5311
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9434
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (34) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDLS (84). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDLS (99). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDLS (92). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDLS (94). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NDLSYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NDLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMS66.900.76
+1.14%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Sm-Cp ETF
OPPJ41.350.38
+0.92%
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
QLTY35.130.25
+0.72%
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
EVIM51.990.37
+0.71%
Eaton Vance Intermediate Muncpl Inc ETF
SCLZ53.59-0.19
-0.36%
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

NDLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NDLS and CBRL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NDLS and CBRL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDLS
1D Price
Change %
NDLS100%
-3.04%
CBRL - NDLS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
CAKE - NDLS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CNNE - NDLS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
PTLO - NDLS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
YUMC - NDLS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+0.51%
YUM - YUMC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
QSR - YUMC
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
DPZ - YUMC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
HDL - YUMC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
ARCO - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More