Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PFIPX
NDCAX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PFIPX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv A
Price$10.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.84M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
NDCAX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. NDCAX (247M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: NDCAX (3.60) vs PFIPX (2.51). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.83). NDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.74 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PFIPX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. NDCAX (8.31). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.20 vs. NDCAX (8.43).
| NDCAX | PFIPX | NDCAX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.697 | 1.030 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 2.22B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 2.51 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 8.91 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 22.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.43 | 10.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.11 | 41.63 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement