Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PFIPX
NDCAX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PFIPX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv A
Price$10.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.49M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
NDCAX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PFIPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. NDCAX (249M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: NDCAX (3.49) vs PFIPX (2.49). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.83). NDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.74 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PFIPX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. NDCAX (6.06). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.23 vs. NDCAX (6.67).
| NDCAX | PFIPX | NDCAX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.393 | 8.610 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 2.22B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 2.49 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 8.14 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.94 | 24.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.67 | 10.23 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.33 | 36.47 | 80% |