Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv A
Price$9.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.82M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.98
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.38M
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 569M vs. NDCAX (260M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NDCAX (3.57) vs PACAX (2.98). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (25 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.83). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. NDCAX (28.74). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. NDCAX (3.48). PACAX (9.73) and NDCAX (9.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.592 | 4.776 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 569M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 2.98 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | 5.73 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.26 | 18.40 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.34 | 9.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.20 | 22.73 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement