Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv A
Price$10.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.84M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.7M
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 604M vs. NDCAX (247M). PACAX pays higher dividends than NDCAX: PACAX (4.03) vs NDCAX (3.60). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.83). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NDCAX (28.74). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. NDCAX (8.31). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.39 vs. NDCAX (8.43).
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.697 | 0.537 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 604M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 4.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 9.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 28.27 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.43 | 10.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.11 | 41.64 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement