It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -1.33% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
NDAQ | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ | TMFE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago37% | 4 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago44% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago44% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago66% | 4 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago46% | 7 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 4 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RFIX | 43.90 | 0.84 | +1.95% |
Simplify Downside Interest Rate Hedge Strategy ETF | |||
SCHA | 27.65 | 0.17 | +0.62% |
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™ | |||
NBSM | 26.03 | 0.13 | +0.50% |
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF | |||
XRLV | 55.45 | 0.14 | +0.25% |
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF | |||
CDC | 66.04 | -0.17 | -0.26% |
VictoryShares US EQ Inc Enh Vol Wtd ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ | 100% | -0.87% | ||
MCO - NDAQ | 77% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
MS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
JEF - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
GS - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -3.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFE has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFE jumps, then META could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMFE | 100% | +0.01% | ||
META - TMFE | 74% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
AMZN - TMFE | 74% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
NDAQ - TMFE | 73% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
ISRG - TMFE | 73% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
AAPL - TMFE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More |