NCSYF
Price
$176.00
Change
-$15.05 (-7.88%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WORX
Price
$1.07
Change
-$0.03 (-2.73%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

NCSYF vs WORX

Header iconNCSYF vs WORX Comparison
Open Charts NCSYF vs WORXBanner chart's image
NICE
Price$176.00
Change-$15.05 (-7.88%)
Volume$41
CapitalizationN/A
SCWorx
Price$1.07
Change-$0.03 (-2.73%)
Volume$32.16K
CapitalizationN/A
NCSYF vs WORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
WORX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCSYF vs. WORX commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCSYF is a Hold and WORX is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (NCSYF: $176.00 vs. WORX: $1.07)
Brand notoriety: NCSYF and WORX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCSYF: 60% vs. WORX: 76%
Market capitalization -- NCSYF: $15.55B vs. WORX: $4.03M
NCSYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.55B. WORX’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWORX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NCSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WORX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WORX is a better buy in the long-term than NCSYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WORX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WORX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

NCSYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while WORX (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

WORX is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCSYF($15.5B) has a higher market cap than WORX($4.03M). NCSYF YTD gains are higher at: -10.660 vs. WORX (-41.848). NCSYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 629M vs. WORX (-1.94M). NCSYF has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. WORX (72.4K). WORX has less debt than NCSYF: WORX (99.9K) vs NCSYF (783M). NCSYF has higher revenues than WORX: NCSYF (2.38B) vs WORX (3.92M).
NCSYFWORXNCSYF / WORX
Capitalization15.5B4.03M384,711%
EBITDA629M-1.94M-32,372%
Gain YTD-10.660-41.84825%
P/E Ratio50.06N/A-
Revenue2.38B3.92M60,617%
Total Cash1.41B72.4K1,944,751%
Total Debt783M99.9K783,784%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCSYF vs WORX: Fundamental Ratings
NCSYF
WORX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
6895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WORX's Valuation (19) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCSYF (62) in the null industry. This means that WORX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCSYF’s over the last 12 months.

NCSYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as WORX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NCSYF’s stock grew similarly to WORX’s over the last 12 months.

NCSYF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as WORX (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NCSYF’s stock grew similarly to WORX’s over the last 12 months.

NCSYF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as WORX (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NCSYF’s stock grew similarly to WORX’s over the last 12 months.

NCSYF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as WORX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NCSYF’s stock grew similarly to WORX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WORX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WORX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

NCSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCSYF has been loosely correlated with OTRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NCSYF jumps, then OTRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCSYF
1D Price
Change %
NCSYF100%
-7.88%
OTRK - NCSYF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.32%
WORX - NCSYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
TLS - NCSYF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
CERT - NCSYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
ICCT - NCSYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More

WORX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WORX has been loosely correlated with SFSVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WORX jumps, then SFSVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WORX
1D Price
Change %
WORX100%
-2.73%
SFSVF - WORX
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NCNO - WORX
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
CNSWF - WORX
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
NCSYF - WORX
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.88%
SWDAF - WORX
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More