NCSYF
Price
$155.87
Change
-$13.91 (-8.19%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.55B
TLS
Price
$2.71
Change
+$0.07 (+2.65%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
292.53M
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NCSYF vs TLS

Header iconNCSYF vs TLS Comparison
Open Charts NCSYF vs TLSBanner chart's image
NICE
Price$155.87
Change-$13.91 (-8.19%)
Volume$10
Capitalization15.55B
Telos
Price$2.71
Change+$0.07 (+2.65%)
Volume$525.48K
Capitalization292.53M
NCSYF vs TLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCSYF vs. TLS commentary
May 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCSYF is a Hold and TLS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NCSYF: $155.87 vs. TLS: $2.71)
Brand notoriety: NCSYF and TLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCSYF: 132% vs. TLS: 64%
Market capitalization -- NCSYF: $15.55B vs. TLS: $292.53M
NCSYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.55B. TLS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $292.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NCSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLS is a better buy in the long-term than NCSYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NCSYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while TLS (@Packaged Software) price change was +38.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

TLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCSYF($15.5B) has a higher market cap than TLS($293M). NCSYF YTD gains are higher at: -13.545 vs. TLS (-20.760). NCSYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 629M vs. TLS (-24.17M). NCSYF has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. TLS (99.3M). TLS has less debt than NCSYF: TLS (11.5M) vs NCSYF (783M). NCSYF has higher revenues than TLS: NCSYF (2.38B) vs TLS (145M).
NCSYFTLSNCSYF / TLS
Capitalization15.5B293M5,290%
EBITDA629M-24.17M-2,602%
Gain YTD-13.545-20.76065%
P/E Ratio50.06N/A-
Revenue2.38B145M1,640%
Total Cash1.41B99.3M1,418%
Total Debt783M11.5M6,809%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCSYF: Fundamental Ratings
NCSYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106446.0100003254.921900
+3.15%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA349.987.16
+2.09%
Tesla
SPY594.203.74
+0.63%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL211.26-0.19
-0.09%
Apple
GME28.45-0.18
-0.63%
GameStop Corp

NCSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCSYF has been loosely correlated with OTRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NCSYF jumps, then OTRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCSYF
1D Price
Change %
NCSYF100%
N/A
OTRK - NCSYF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.32%
WORX - NCSYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
TLS - NCSYF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
CERT - NCSYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
ICCT - NCSYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
More

TLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLS has been loosely correlated with FIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLS jumps, then FIVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLS
1D Price
Change %
TLS100%
+2.65%
FIVN - TLS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
NRDY - TLS
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
MITK - TLS
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
PUBM - TLS
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
ALRM - TLS
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More