NCSYF
Price
$176.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
TLS
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.22 (-6.29%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:47 PM (EDT)
118 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NCSYF vs TLS

Header iconNCSYF vs TLS Comparison
Open Charts NCSYF vs TLSBanner chart's image
NICE
Price$176.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41
CapitalizationN/A
Telos
Price$3.27
Change-$0.22 (-6.29%)
Volume$4.83K
CapitalizationN/A
NCSYF vs TLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCSYF vs. TLS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCSYF is a Hold and TLS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (NCSYF: $176.00 vs. TLS: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: NCSYF and TLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCSYF: 60% vs. TLS: 114%
Market capitalization -- NCSYF: $15.55B vs. TLS: $292.53M
NCSYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.55B. TLS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $292.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NCSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLS is a better buy in the long-term than NCSYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NCSYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while TLS (@Packaged Software) price change was -23.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

TLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCSYF($15.5B) has a higher market cap than TLS($293M). TLS YTD gains are higher at: -4.110 vs. NCSYF (-10.660). NCSYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 629M vs. TLS (-24.17M). NCSYF has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. TLS (99.3M). TLS has less debt than NCSYF: TLS (11.5M) vs NCSYF (783M). NCSYF has higher revenues than TLS: NCSYF (2.38B) vs TLS (145M).
NCSYFTLSNCSYF / TLS
Capitalization15.5B293M5,290%
EBITDA629M-24.17M-2,602%
Gain YTD-10.660-4.110259%
P/E Ratio50.06N/A-
Revenue2.38B145M1,640%
Total Cash1.41B99.3M1,418%
Total Debt783M11.5M6,809%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCSYF: Fundamental Ratings
NCSYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

NCSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCSYF has been loosely correlated with OTRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NCSYF jumps, then OTRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCSYF
1D Price
Change %
NCSYF100%
-7.88%
OTRK - NCSYF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.32%
WORX - NCSYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
TLS - NCSYF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
CERT - NCSYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
ICCT - NCSYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More

TLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLS has been loosely correlated with MITK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLS jumps, then MITK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLS
1D Price
Change %
TLS100%
-5.66%
MITK - TLS
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
PUBM - TLS
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.87%
NRDY - TLS
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
FIVN - TLS
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
ALRM - TLS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More