Advertisement
NCSYF vs OTRK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCSYF is a Hold and OTRK is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOTRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NCSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OTRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NCSYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OTRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NCSYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OTRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NCSYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OTRK (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.37% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| NCSYF | OTRK | NCSYF / OTRK | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 12.3M | 126,016% |
| EBITDA | 629M | -18.01M | -3,493% |
| Gain YTD | -11.232 | -67.358 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.06 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.38B | 11.7M | 20,325% |
| Total Cash | 1.41B | 3.23M | 43,632% |
| Total Debt | 783M | 14.3M | 5,476% |
NCSYF | OTRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OTRK's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NCSYF (59). This means that OTRK’s stock grew similarly to NCSYF’s over the last 12 months.
OTRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NCSYF (100). This means that OTRK’s stock grew similarly to NCSYF’s over the last 12 months.
NCSYF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTRK (100). This means that NCSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTRK’s over the last 12 months.
NCSYF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTRK (97). This means that NCSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTRK’s over the last 12 months.
NCSYF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as OTRK (100). This means that NCSYF’s stock grew similarly to OTRK’s over the last 12 months.
| NCSYF | OTRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 18% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
NCSYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCSYF has been loosely correlated with OTRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NCSYF jumps, then OTRK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCSYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCSYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OTRK - NCSYF | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WORX - NCSYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
| TLS - NCSYF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| CERT - NCSYF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| DCBO - NCSYF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
OTRK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OTRK has been loosely correlated with LIFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OTRK jumps, then LIFX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OTRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTRK | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| LIFX - OTRK | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NCSYF - OTRK | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALLT - OTRK | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| DTRK - OTRK | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HSTM - OTRK | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||