NCPL
Price
$3.19
Change
-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.8M
TVAVF
Price
$19.37
Change
+$0.53 (+2.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
627.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs TVAVF

Header iconNCPL vs TVAVF Comparison
Open Charts NCPL vs TVAVFBanner chart's image
NETCAPITAL
Price$3.19
Change-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Volume$139.74K
Capitalization2.8M
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Price$19.37
Change+$0.53 (+2.81%)
Volume$938
Capitalization627.84M
NCPL vs TVAVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVAVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. TVAVF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Hold and TVAVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NCPL: $3.19 vs. TVAVF: $19.37)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and TVAVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 21% vs. TVAVF: 70%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $2.8M vs. TVAVF: $627.84M
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.8M. TVAVF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $627.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTVAVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TVAVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TVAVF is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TVAVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TVAVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TVAVF is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while TVAVF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TVAVF($628M) has a higher market cap than NCPL($2.8M). TVAVF has higher P/E ratio than NCPL: TVAVF (40.49) vs NCPL (0.25). TVAVF YTD gains are higher at: 65.556 vs. NCPL (53.365). TVAVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 133M vs. NCPL (-3.19M). TVAVF has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. NCPL (2.17M). NCPL has less debt than TVAVF: NCPL (2.44M) vs TVAVF (17.2M). TVAVF has higher revenues than NCPL: TVAVF (360M) vs NCPL (7.72M).
NCPLTVAVFNCPL / TVAVF
Capitalization2.8M628M0%
EBITDA-3.19M133M-2%
Gain YTD53.36565.55681%
P/E Ratio0.2540.491%
Revenue7.72M360M2%
Total Cash2.17M373M1%
Total Debt2.44M17.2M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLTVAVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVAVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHVX41.560.24
+0.58%
Hartford Healthcare R6
SUTZX16.690.08
+0.48%
AB Sustainable US Thematic Z
MTCIX76.510.29
+0.38%
MFS Technology I
SUVCX10.780.04
+0.37%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
FPACX43.93-0.07
-0.16%
FPA Crescent

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and NMR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
-2.45%
NMR - NCPL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
MS - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
MORN - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More

TVAVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TVAVF and TMXXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVAVF and TMXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TVAVF
1D Price
Change %
TVAVF100%
+2.81%
TMXXF - TVAVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGL - TVAVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
NCPL - TVAVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
PWP - TVAVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
MNXBF - TVAVF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More