NCPL
Price
$1.99
Change
-$0.05 (-2.45%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.07M
SF
Price
$114.20
Change
-$1.70 (-1.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.67B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs SF

Header iconNCPL vs SF Comparison
Open Charts NCPL vs SFBanner chart's image
NETCAPITAL
Price$1.99
Change-$0.05 (-2.45%)
Volume$127.92K
Capitalization9.07M
Stifel Financial
Price$114.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.47%)
Volume$925.38K
Capitalization11.67B
NCPL vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. SF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Hold and SF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NCPL: $1.99 vs. SF: $114.20)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 21% vs. SF: 125%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $9.07M vs. SF: $11.67B
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.07M. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -36.38% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.7B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($9.07M). SF YTD gains are higher at: 8.653 vs. NCPL (-4.567). NCPL has less debt than SF: NCPL (2.42M) vs SF (1.52B). SF has higher revenues than NCPL: SF (5B) vs NCPL (813K).
NCPLSFNCPL / SF
Capitalization9.07M11.7B0%
EBITDA-10.28MN/A-
Gain YTD-4.5678.653-53%
P/E RatioN/A22.13-
Revenue813K5B0%
Total Cash614KN/A-
Total Debt2.42M1.52B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
9612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (80) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (96) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NCPL (65) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPEV19.700.32
+1.65%
XPeng
MGYR17.500.02
+0.11%
Magyar Bancorp
ADV1.80-0.02
-1.10%
Advantage Solutions
MIGI0.44-0.03
-6.17%
Mawson Infrastructure Group
SBET19.85-3.64
-15.50%
SharpLink Gaming Inc

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and SPGI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and SPGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
-2.70%
SPGI - NCPL
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
HOOD - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
MORN - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.47%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
JEF - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
More