NCPL
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.05 (-2.63%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.73M
SF
Price
$112.58
Change
-$3.13 (-2.71%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs SF

Header iconNCPL vs SF Comparison
Open Charts NCPL vs SFBanner chart's image
NETCAPITAL
Price$1.85
Change-$0.05 (-2.63%)
Volume$109.32K
Capitalization8.73M
Stifel Financial
Price$112.58
Change-$3.13 (-2.71%)
Volume$736.18K
Capitalization11.5B
NCPL vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. SF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Hold and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NCPL: $1.85 vs. SF: $112.58)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 23% vs. SF: 102%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $8.73M vs. SF: $11.5B
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.73M. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.50% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.5B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($8.73M). SF YTD gains are higher at: 7.541 vs. NCPL (-11.058). NCPL has less debt than SF: NCPL (2.42M) vs SF (1.55B).
NCPLSFNCPL / SF
Capitalization8.73M11.5B0%
EBITDA-10.28MN/A-
Gain YTD-11.0587.541-147%
P/E RatioN/A21.82-
Revenue813KN/A-
Total Cash614KN/A-
Total Debt2.42M1.55B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
9712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (81) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (97) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (92) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMIF25.420.49
+1.95%
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
NAC11.380.13
+1.16%
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
RSSB27.600.24
+0.88%
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
TMFS36.040.09
+0.24%
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
IONL41.51-0.67
-1.60%
GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and SPGI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and SPGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
-2.63%
SPGI - NCPL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
HOOD - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
MORN - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-2.71%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
JEF - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More