NCPL
Price
$6.70
Change
-$1.75 (-20.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.8M
NMR
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.04 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.15B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs NMR

Header iconNCPL vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts NCPL vs NMRBanner chart's image
NETCAPITAL
Price$6.70
Change-$1.75 (-20.71%)
Volume$3.82M
Capitalization2.8M
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.61%)
Volume$312.06K
Capitalization18.15B
NCPL vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. NMR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Buy and NMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NCPL: $6.70 vs. NMR: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 893% vs. NMR: 57%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $2.8M vs. NMR: $18.15B
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.8M. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $18.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +41.65% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($2.8M). NMR has higher P/E ratio than NCPL: NMR (25.08) vs NCPL (0.25). NCPL YTD gains are higher at: 222.115 vs. NMR (12.435). NCPL has less debt than NMR: NCPL (2.44M) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than NCPL: NMR (1.27T) vs NCPL (7.72M).
NCPLNMRNCPL / NMR
Capitalization2.8M18.1B0%
EBITDA-3.19MN/A-
Gain YTD222.11512.4351,786%
P/E Ratio0.2525.081%
Revenue7.72M1.27T0%
Total Cash2.17MN/A-
Total Debt2.44M13.16T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (74) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (95) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNOV27.450.16
+0.60%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Nov
GMAR39.100.11
+0.27%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Mar
XIDE30.220.03
+0.10%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & PrmIncETF-Dec
UCON24.85-0.03
-0.12%
First Trust Smith Unconstrained Pl BdETF
WEAT4.63-0.01
-0.22%
Teucrium Wheat Fund

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and NMR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
-20.71%
NMR - NCPL
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
SNEX - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
MS - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-0.61%
SF - NMR
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
EVR - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
JEF - NMR
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
PIPR - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MC - NMR
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More