Advertisement
NCLH vs RCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCLH is a Hold and RCL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRCL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- NCLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RCL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NCLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NCLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NCLH (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while RCL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +5.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
NCLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
RCL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (+0.41% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| NCLH | RCL | NCLH / RCL | |
| Capitalization | 11.2B | 98.7B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 2.38B | 6.62B | 36% |
| Gain YTD | -3.459 | 58.445 | -6% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.01 | 27.01 | 63% |
| Revenue | 9.56B | 17.2B | 56% |
| Total Cash | 184M | 735M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 13.8B | 19.7B | 70% |
NCLH | RCL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 1 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RCL's Valuation (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as NCLH (84). This means that RCL’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
RCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (66). This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH's SMR Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RCL (20). This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to RCL’s over the last 12 months.
RCL's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as NCLH (8). This means that RCL’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
RCL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (59). This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
| NCLH | RCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
NCLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | 100% | -2.17% | ||
| CCL - NCLH | 88% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| CUK - NCLH | 87% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| RCL - NCLH | 79% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| VIK - NCLH | 70% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TNL - NCLH | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||
RCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.