NCBDF
Price
$27.75
Change
-$1.92 (-6.47%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
17.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NINOF
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.08 (-0.72%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCBDF vs NINOF

Header iconNCBDF vs NINOF Comparison
Open Charts NCBDF vs NINOFBanner chart's image
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$27.75
Change-$1.92 (-6.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization17.43B
Nikon
Price$11.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.72%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization3.62B
NCBDF vs NINOF Comparison Chart in %
NCBDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NINOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCBDF vs. NINOF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCBDF is a StrongBuy and NINOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NCBDF: $27.75 vs. NINOF: $11.10)
Brand notoriety: NCBDF and NINOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCBDF: 50% vs. NINOF: 59%
Market capitalization -- NCBDF: $17.43B vs. NINOF: $3.62B
NCBDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $17.43B. NINOF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $30.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCBDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNINOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NCBDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NINOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NINOF is a better buy in the long-term than NCBDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCBDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NINOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCBDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NINOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NINOF is a better buy in the short-term than NCBDF.

Price Growth

NCBDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NINOF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.09% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCBDF($17.4B) has a higher market cap than NINOF($3.63B). NINOF has higher P/E ratio than NCBDF: NINOF (68.09) vs NCBDF (22.07). NCBDF YTD gains are higher at: 30.896 vs. NINOF (18.085). NCBDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 221B vs. NINOF (44.7B). NCBDF has more cash in the bank: 372B vs. NINOF (163B). NCBDF has higher revenues than NINOF: NCBDF (1.27T) vs NINOF (695B).
NCBDFNINOFNCBDF / NINOF
Capitalization17.4B3.63B480%
EBITDA221B44.7B494%
Gain YTD30.89618.085171%
P/E Ratio22.0768.0932%
Revenue1.27T695B183%
Total Cash372B163B228%
Total DebtN/A223B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCBDF vs NINOF: Fundamental Ratings
NCBDF
NINOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8042
SMR RATING
1..100
998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
205
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NINOF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCBDF (94). This means that NINOF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

NINOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCBDF (80). This means that NINOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NINOF (98). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NINOF’s over the last 12 months.

NINOF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as NCBDF (60). This means that NINOF’s stock grew similarly to NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

NINOF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as NCBDF (20). This means that NINOF’s stock grew similarly to NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCBDFNINOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCBDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NINOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHY12.430.04
+0.32%
PGIM Global High Yield Fund
SPYT17.960.05
+0.28%
Defiance S&P 500 Target Income ETF
BBIN72.840.15
+0.21%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Intl Eq ETF
QBIG39.040.02
+0.06%
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
BITC37.71N/A
-0.01%
Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin&TreasRotaStrat

NCBDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDF and NCBDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDF and NCBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDF
1D Price
Change %
NCBDF100%
N/A
NCBDY - NCBDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
ANPDF - NCBDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - NCBDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
OLCLF - NCBDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGY - NCBDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

NINOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NINOF and LEAT have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NINOF and LEAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NINOF
1D Price
Change %
NINOF100%
N/A
LEAT - NINOF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
NINOY - NINOF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
LNNGY - NINOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
NCBDF - NINOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLF - NINOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More