NCAUF
Price
$0.57
Change
+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
150.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PGOL
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCAUF vs PGOL

Header iconNCAUF vs PGOL Comparison
Open Charts NCAUF vs PGOLBanner chart's image
Newcore Gold
Price$0.57
Change+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Volume$88.17K
Capitalization150.28M
Patriot Gold
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$64.32K
Capitalization5.34M
NCAUF vs PGOL Comparison Chart in %
NCAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGOL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCAUF vs. PGOL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCAUF is a Buy and PGOL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (NCAUF: $0.57 vs. PGOL: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: NCAUF and PGOL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCAUF: 70% vs. PGOL: 95%
Market capitalization -- NCAUF: $150.28M vs. PGOL: $5.34M
NCAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $150.28M. PGOL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGOL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGOL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NCAUF and PGOL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCAUF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGOL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCAUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGOL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCAUF is a better buy in the short-term than PGOL.

Price Growth

NCAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while PGOL (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCAUF($150M) has a higher market cap than PGOL($5.34M). PGOL YTD gains are higher at: 167.909 vs. NCAUF (27.296). PGOL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.09M vs. NCAUF (-4.54M). NCAUF has more cash in the bank: 10.9M vs. PGOL (71.4K). NCAUF (0) and PGOL (0) have equivalent revenues.
NCAUFPGOLNCAUF / PGOL
Capitalization150M5.34M2,811%
EBITDA-4.54M-2.09M217%
Gain YTD27.296167.90916%
P/E RatioN/A67.74-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.9M71.4K15,266%
Total DebtN/A251K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCAUF vs PGOL: Fundamental Ratings
NCAUF
PGOL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCAUF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGOL (81). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as PGOL (100). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PGOL (100). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

PGOL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NCAUF (38). This means that PGOL’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

PGOL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCAUF (100). This means that PGOL’s stock grew significantly faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCAUFPGOL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGOL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFUS0.03N/A
+5.32%
Impact Fusion International Inc.
MAYNF2.11N/A
N/A
Mayne Pharma Ltd.
NGKSY21.40N/A
N/A
NITERRA CO LTD.
PSTVY13.00N/A
N/A
Postal Svgs Bk of China Ltd.
LONKF0.36N/A
N/A
Lonking Holdings, Ltd.

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and DRD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and DRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
+0.27%
DRD - NCAUF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
NGD - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
NEM - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
PAAS - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.67%
HSTXF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.58%
More

PGOL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGOL and PMNXF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGOL and PMNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGOL
1D Price
Change %
PGOL100%
N/A
PMNXF - PGOL
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
PLMNF - PGOL
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PGOL
3%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
NCAUF - PGOL
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%