NCAUF
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
123.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAAS
Price
$55.39
Change
+$1.56 (+2.90%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
22.63B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCAUF vs PAAS

Header iconNCAUF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts NCAUF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Newcore Gold
Price$0.49
Change+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Volume$56.24K
Capitalization123.21M
Pan American Silver
Price$55.39
Change+$1.56 (+2.90%)
Volume$6.5M
Capitalization22.63B
NCAUF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCAUF vs. PAAS commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCAUF is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NCAUF: $0.49 vs. PAAS: $55.39)
Brand notoriety: NCAUF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCAUF: 73% vs. PAAS: 108%
Market capitalization -- NCAUF: $123.21M vs. PAAS: $22.63B
NCAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $123.21M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than NCAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCAUF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCAUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCAUF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

NCAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.23% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($22.6B) has a higher market cap than NCAUF($123M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 177.331 vs. NCAUF (126.505). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. NCAUF (-4.54M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 911M vs. NCAUF (10.9M). PAAS has higher revenues than NCAUF: PAAS (3.26B) vs NCAUF (0).
NCAUFPAASNCAUF / PAAS
Capitalization123M22.6B1%
EBITDA-4.54M1.52B-0%
Gain YTD126.505177.33171%
P/E RatioN/A32.02-
Revenue03.26B-
Total Cash10.9M911M1%
Total DebtN/A857M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCAUF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
NCAUF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NCAUF (41) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (66) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NCAUF (92) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NCAUF (43) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCAUFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XBOC33.670.02
+0.06%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF™ Oct
DVSPF5.46N/A
N/A
Dividend 15 Split Corp.
BGIG32.65N/A
-0.01%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
KYN12.09-0.05
-0.41%
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
UPGR25.06-0.21
-0.81%
Xtrackers US Green Infras Sel Eq ETF

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and DRD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and DRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
+3.90%
DRD - NCAUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
NGD - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
NEM - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
PAAS - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
HSTXF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.12%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+2.90%
WPM - PAAS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
AEM - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
CGAU - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
KGC - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
More