NBYCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10M
PGXFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBYCF vs PGXFF

Header iconNBYCF vs PGXFF Comparison
Open Charts NBYCF vs PGXFFBanner chart's image
Niobay Metals
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$25.86K
Capitalization10M
Prosper Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization2.23M
NBYCF vs PGXFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBYCF vs. PGXFF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBYCF is a StrongBuy and PGXFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NBYCF: $0.07 vs. PGXFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: NBYCF and PGXFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBYCF: 85% vs. PGXFF: 104%
Market capitalization -- NBYCF: $10M vs. PGXFF: $2.23M
NBYCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10M. PGXFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGXFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBYCF is a better buy in the long-term than PGXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBYCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGXFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBYCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGXFF is a better buy in the short-term than NBYCF.

Price Growth

NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +21.93% price change this week, while PGXFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBYCF($10M) has a higher market cap than PGXFF($2.23M). NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 93.716 vs. PGXFF (-35.364). PGXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.37M vs. NBYCF (-2.9M). NBYCF has more cash in the bank: 1.35M vs. PGXFF (629K). NBYCF (0) and PGXFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NBYCFPGXFFNBYCF / PGXFF
Capitalization10M2.23M448%
EBITDA-2.9M-2.37M122%
Gain YTD93.716-35.364-265%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.35M629K215%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBYCF vs PGXFF: Fundamental Ratings
NBYCF
PGXFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4091
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGXFF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (78). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NBYCF (100). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NBYCF (99). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (91). This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (100). This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBYCFPGXFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIEVF191.00N/A
N/A
D IETEREN GROUP NV
EMITF1.80N/A
N/A
Elbit Imaging, Ltd.
CCARF0.95N/A
N/A
Colonial Coal International Corp
CGGGF1.12N/A
N/A
Coats Group PLC
MHGUP20.00-1.80
-8.26%
Meritage Hospitality Group, Inc.

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and TLOFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and TLOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+14.91%
TLOFF - NBYCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
AABB - NBYCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-9.00%
WESMF - NBYCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGXFF - NBYCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVDF - NBYCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

PGXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGXFF and LLLAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGXFF and LLLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGXFF
1D Price
Change %
PGXFF100%
N/A
LLLAF - PGXFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNCXF - PGXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
ABCFF - PGXFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-20.18%
GEODF - PGXFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
KLDCF - PGXFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More