NBYCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.85M
PGXFF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBYCF vs PGXFF

Header iconNBYCF vs PGXFF Comparison
Open Charts NBYCF vs PGXFFBanner chart's image
Niobay Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$53.28K
Capitalization5.85M
Prosper Gold
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization2.25M
NBYCF vs PGXFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBYCF vs. PGXFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBYCF is a Hold and PGXFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NBYCF: $0.05 vs. PGXFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: NBYCF and PGXFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBYCF: 73% vs. PGXFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- NBYCF: $5.85M vs. PGXFF: $2.25M
NBYCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.85M. PGXFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGXFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBYCF is a better buy in the long-term than PGXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBYCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGXFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBYCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBYCF is a better buy in the short-term than PGXFF.

Price Growth

NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while PGXFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -24.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBYCF($5.85M) has a higher market cap than PGXFF($2.25M). NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 50.273 vs. PGXFF (-33.925). PGXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.37M vs. NBYCF (-2.81M). NBYCF has more cash in the bank: 2.27M vs. PGXFF (629K). NBYCF (0) and PGXFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NBYCFPGXFFNBYCF / PGXFF
Capitalization5.85M2.25M260%
EBITDA-2.81M-2.37M118%
Gain YTD50.273-33.925-148%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.27M629K360%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBYCF vs PGXFF: Fundamental Ratings
NBYCF
PGXFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6597
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGXFF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (76). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NBYCF (100). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXFF (99). This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (96). This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (100). This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBYCFPGXFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPG111.80-0.15
-0.13%
PPG Industries
GCMG12.89-0.10
-0.77%
GCM Grosvenor
VERI2.63-0.05
-1.87%
Veritone
INDB66.08-1.92
-2.82%
Independent Bank Corp
VSEE0.78-0.08
-9.13%
VSee Health Inc.

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and TLOFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and TLOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+5.12%
TLOFF - NBYCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
AABB - NBYCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
WESMF - NBYCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+160.00%
NBRFF - NBYCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGXFF - NBYCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+16.98%
More

PGXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGXFF and LLLAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGXFF and LLLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGXFF
1D Price
Change %
PGXFF100%
+16.98%
LLLAF - PGXFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNCXF - PGXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.49%
ABCFF - PGXFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
GEODF - PGXFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLDCF - PGXFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More