NBVAF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
49.88M
VHC
Price
$20.08
Change
-$0.26 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
22.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBVAF vs VHC

Header iconNBVAF vs VHC Comparison
Open Charts NBVAF vs VHCBanner chart's image
Nubeva Technologies
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization49.88M
VirnetX Holding
Price$20.08
Change-$0.26 (-1.28%)
Volume$24.74K
Capitalization22.98M
NBVAF vs VHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBVAF vs. VHC commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBVAF is a Hold and VHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (NBVAF: $0.05 vs. VHC: $20.08)
Brand notoriety: NBVAF and VHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBVAF: 120% vs. VHC: 112%
Market capitalization -- NBVAF: $49.88M vs. VHC: $22.98M
NBVAF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $49.88M. VHC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $22.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBVAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBVAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBVAF is a better buy in the long-term than VHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBVAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBVAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VHC is a better buy in the short-term than NBVAF.

Price Growth

NBVAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.70% price change this week, while VHC (@Packaged Software) price change was +14.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.51% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBVAF($49.9M) has a higher market cap than VHC($23M). VHC YTD gains are higher at: 155.796 vs. NBVAF (-56.349). NBVAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.24M vs. VHC (-31.44M). VHC has more cash in the bank: 53.5M vs. NBVAF (3.31M). VHC has less debt than NBVAF: VHC (0) vs NBVAF (27.2K). NBVAF has higher revenues than VHC: NBVAF (1.26M) vs VHC (7K).
NBVAFVHCNBVAF / VHC
Capitalization49.9M23M217%
EBITDA-2.24M-31.44M7%
Gain YTD-56.349155.796-36%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.26M7K17,957%
Total Cash3.31M53.5M6%
Total Debt27.2K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBVAF vs VHC: Fundamental Ratings
NBVAF
VHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
8897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBVAF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VHC (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBVAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as VHC (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew similarly to VHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBVAF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as VHC (97) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew similarly to VHC’s over the last 12 months.

VHC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBVAF (96) in the null industry. This means that VHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.

VHC's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as NBVAF (100) in the null industry. This means that VHC’s stock grew similarly to NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBVAFVHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMNM10.820.24
+2.27%
Immunome
ASUR10.210.17
+1.69%
Asure Software
AB41.490.28
+0.68%
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
KMI27.11-0.77
-2.76%
Kinder Morgan
OCC5.40-0.34
-5.84%
Optical Cable Corp

NBVAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBVAF and S have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBVAF and S's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBVAF
1D Price
Change %
NBVAF100%
N/A
S - NBVAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.83%
EVH - NBVAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
PRVA - NBVAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
GDDY - NBVAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
VHC - NBVAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
More

VHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VHC has been loosely correlated with DFDV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VHC jumps, then DFDV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VHC
1D Price
Change %
VHC100%
-1.28%
DFDV - VHC
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
INTZ - VHC
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
IDAI - VHC
26%
Poorly correlated
-9.90%
IDCC - VHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
PANW - VHC
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More