NBVAF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.1M
S
Price
$18.14
Change
-$0.05 (-0.27%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.08B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBVAF vs S

Header iconNBVAF vs S Comparison
Open Charts NBVAF vs SBanner chart's image
Nubeva Technologies
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$900
Capitalization7.1M
SentinelOne
Price$18.14
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
Volume$3.44M
Capitalization6.08B
NBVAF vs S Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBVAF vs. S commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBVAF is a Hold and S is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NBVAF: $0.10 vs. S: $18.16)
Brand notoriety: NBVAF: Not notable vs. S: Notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBVAF: 5% vs. S: 19%
Market capitalization -- NBVAF: $7.1M vs. S: $6.08B
NBVAF [@Computer Communications] is valued at $7.1M. S’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $6.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBVAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NBVAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBVAF is a better buy in the long-term than S.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBVAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBVAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the short-term than NBVAF.

Price Growth

NBVAF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +74.00% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

S is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.28% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
S($6.08B) has a higher market cap than NBVAF($7.1M). NBVAF YTD gains are higher at: -17.143 vs. S (-18.198). NBVAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 277K vs. S (-235.73M). S has more cash in the bank: 811M vs. NBVAF (3.19M). NBVAF has less debt than S: NBVAF (14.2K) vs S (11.5M). S has higher revenues than NBVAF: S (907M) vs NBVAF (642K).
NBVAFSNBVAF / S
Capitalization7.1M6.08B0%
EBITDA277K-235.73M-0%
Gain YTD-17.143-18.19894%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue642K907M0%
Total Cash3.19M811M0%
Total Debt14.2K11.5M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBVAF vs S: Fundamental Ratings
NBVAF
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBVAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (76) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

S's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as NBVAF (100) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.

NBVAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as S (97) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

NBVAF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as S (57) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBVAF (100) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBVAFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDO3.100.12
+4.03%
Indonesia Energy Corp
AMPX11.07-0.01
-0.14%
Amprius Technologies
HRB49.29-0.16
-0.32%
H&R Block
RTX160.52-0.85
-0.53%
RTX Corp
GALT4.58-0.17
-3.66%
Galectin Therapeutics

NBVAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBVAF and S have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBVAF and S's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBVAF
1D Price
Change %
NBVAF100%
N/A
S - NBVAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
EVH - NBVAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
PRVA - NBVAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
GDDY - NBVAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
VHC - NBVAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
-0.16%
HUBS - S
67%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
SNPS - S
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRM - S
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
CRWD - S
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
NET - S
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More