Advertisement
NBVAF vs S
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBVAF is a Hold and S is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NBVAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NBVAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NBVAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NBVAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NBVAF (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was -7.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| NBVAF | S | NBVAF / S | |
| Capitalization | 3.83M | 5.33B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 277K | -240.23M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -52.381 | -24.910 | 210% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 642K | 864M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 3.19M | 767M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 14.2K | 12.6M | 0% |
NBVAF | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NBVAF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (77) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as NBVAF (99) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.
NBVAF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as S (96) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that NBVAF’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as NBVAF (86) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBVAF (100) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than NBVAF’s over the last 12 months.
| NBVAF | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 80% | 15 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
NBVAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBVAF and S have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBVAF and S's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBVAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBVAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| S - NBVAF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EVH - NBVAF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRVA - NBVAF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.48% | ||
| GDDY - NBVAF | 21% Poorly correlated | -11.25% | ||
| VHC - NBVAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -8.01% | ||
More | ||||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.