Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSSX vs RPEBX
NBSSX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts NBSSX vs RPEBX
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$35.16
Change-$0.16 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets793.88M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.33
Change+$0.47 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
NBSSX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSSX vs. RPEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSSX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. NBSSX (794M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: RPEBX (0.12) vs NBSSX (0.10). NBSSX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: NBSSX (70 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NBSSX (0.91). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: RPEBX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. RPEBX (14.50). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.38 vs. NBSSX (26.03).
| NBSSX | RPEBX | NBSSX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.21 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.21 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 70 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.696 | 15.388 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 794M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.12 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | 14.50 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.97 | 47.01 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.03 | 32.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.72 | 91.19 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers