Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMNX
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$53.38
Change-$2.64 (-4.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets537.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 538M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NBSMX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.13). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs NBSMX (1000000). NBSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.04 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). NBSMX return over 5 years is better than : 13.63 vs. WCMNX (3.45).
| NBSMX | WCMNX | NBSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 2.04 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.152 | 6.304 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 41.9M | 1,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | -3.16 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.62 | 22.08 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 3.45 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement