Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRTX vs VEVYX
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRTX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inst
Price$28.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.84M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.94
Change+$0.45 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16B
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. NBRTX (50.8M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBRTX: VEVYX (1.02) vs NBRTX (0.66). NBRTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRTX (16 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBRTX (29.00). NBRTX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.84 vs. VEVYX (-12.93). NBRTX return over 5 years is better than : 54.67 vs. VEVYX (20.07).
| NBRTX | VEVYX | NBRTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.66 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.146 | 2.309 | 396% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 16B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.02 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.84 | -12.93 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.07 | -2.22 | -770% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.67 | 20.07 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.49 | 47.79 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers