Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRTX vs VEVYX
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRTX vs VEVYX
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val Inst
Price$27.37
Change-$1.07 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.72M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. NBRTX (50.7M). NBRTX pays higher dividends than VEVYX: NBRTX (0.94) vs VEVYX (0.89). NBRTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRTX (16 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. NBRTX (16.00). NBRTX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.04 vs. VEVYX (2.79). NBRTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.63 vs. VEVYX (20.54).
| NBRTX | VEVYX | NBRTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.66 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.426 | 6.775 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.7M | 16.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 2.79 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.50 | 3.61 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.63 | 20.54 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.46 | 88.67 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement