Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.72
Change-$0.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.34M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$66.02
Change-$1.13 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. NBNCX (247M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.83) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.51 vs. NBNCX (12.36). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.92 vs. NBNCX (4.90).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.918 | 23.034 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.83 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.36 | 16.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.09 | 36.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.90 | 9.92 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.73 | 47.29 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers