Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$15.06
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$66.15
Change-$0.43 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. NBNCX (249M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.84) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. NBNCX (13.51). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.37 vs. RERFX (5.08).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.810 | 24.078 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.84 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.51 | 14.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.55 | 35.40 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.37 | 5.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.34 | 53.55 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers