Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.21
Change-$0.19 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.34M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$66.02
Change-$1.13 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. NBNAX (247M). RERFX (0.83) and NBNAX (0.80) have matching dividends . NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.62 vs. NBNAX (13.18). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.80 vs. NBNAX (10.84).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.195 | 25.140 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 17.62 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.75 | 38.08 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.84 | 11.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.16 | 50.80 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers