NBN
Price
$83.13
Change
-$2.18 (-2.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
431.52M
50 days until earnings call
PSTVY
Price
$13.20
Change
-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
70.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBN vs PSTVY

Header iconNBN vs PSTVY Comparison
Open Charts NBN vs PSTVYBanner chart's image
Northeast Bank
Price$83.13
Change-$2.18 (-2.56%)
Volume$70.25K
Capitalization431.52M
Postal Svgs Bk of China
Price$13.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Volume$545
Capitalization70.03B
NBN vs PSTVY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBN vs. PSTVY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBN is a StrongBuy and PSTVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NBN: $83.13 vs. PSTVY: $13.20)
Brand notoriety: NBN and PSTVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBN: 158% vs. PSTVY: 45%
Market capitalization -- NBN: $431.52M vs. PSTVY: $70.03B
NBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $431.52M. PSTVY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $70.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePSTVY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NBN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PSTVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSTVY is a better buy in the long-term than NBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NBN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while PSTVY (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSTVY($70B) has a higher market cap than NBN($432M). NBN has higher P/E ratio than PSTVY: NBN (7.67) vs PSTVY (4.94). PSTVY YTD gains are higher at: 13.318 vs. NBN (-9.356). PSTVY has higher revenues than NBN: PSTVY (235B) vs NBN (142M).
NBNPSTVYNBN / PSTVY
Capitalization432M70B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.35613.318-70%
P/E Ratio7.674.94155%
Revenue142M235B0%
Total Cash2.04MN/A-
Total Debt468MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBN vs PSTVY: Fundamental Ratings
NBN
PSTVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1478
SMR RATING
1..100
191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSTVY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBN (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PSTVY’s stock grew significantly faster than NBN’s over the last 12 months.

NBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSTVY (78) in the null industry. This means that NBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSTVY’s over the last 12 months.

PSTVY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NBN (19) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PSTVY’s stock grew similarly to NBN’s over the last 12 months.

PSTVY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NBN (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PSTVY’s stock grew similarly to NBN’s over the last 12 months.

NBN's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PSTVY (29) in the null industry. This means that NBN’s stock grew similarly to PSTVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HQISX20.92-0.16
-0.76%
Hartford Equity Income R4
PISYX11.64-0.13
-1.10%
Victory Pioneer Intrinsic Value Y
GSPUX40.46-0.53
-1.29%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R6
ARIBX14.51-0.25
-1.69%
Aristotle Small Cap Eq I
FSRFX97.83-1.74
-1.75%
Fidelity Select Transportation

NBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBN has been closely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBN jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBN
1D Price
Change %
NBN100%
-2.56%
CAC - NBN
78%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
BHLB - NBN
78%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
EQBK - NBN
78%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
ASB - NBN
78%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
FNB - NBN
78%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
More

PSTVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSTVY and CIHKY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSTVY and CIHKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSTVY
1D Price
Change %
PSTVY100%
-0.34%
CIHKY - PSTVY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
NBN - PSTVY
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
HSNGY - PSTVY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
WSBF - PSTVY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
CFFI - PSTVY
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More