Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMRX vs VEVYX
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBMRX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$28.12
Change-$0.47 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.97M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.92
Change-$0.46 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.42B
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMRX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMRX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. NBMRX (51M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: VEVYX (1.05) vs NBMRX (0.75). NBMRX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBMRX (7 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: NBMRX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.60 vs. VEVYX (-12.13). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.62 vs. VEVYX (23.29).
| NBMRX | VEVYX | NBMRX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.66 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.165 | 1.716 | 417% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51M | 16.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | -12.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.35 | -0.47 | -3,876% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.62 | 23.29 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement