Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHIX vs RMFCX
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NBHIX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income I
Price$14.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets967.25M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NBHIX (967M). NBHIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NBHIX (2.03) vs RMFCX (1.27). NBHIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NBHIX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NBHIX (0.73). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHIX: RMFCX (250) vs NBHIX (1000000). NBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.92 vs. RMFCX (11.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. NBHIX (41.35).
| NBHIX | RMFCX | NBHIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.467 | 9.596 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 967M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.27 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 11.47 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.20 | 29.27 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.35 | 61.83 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.14 | 79.21 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement