Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs RMFCX
NBHCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.72
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets967.25M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NBHCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NBHCX (967M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: RMFCX (1.27) vs NBHCX (1.00). NBHCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NBHCX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHCX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHCX: RMFCX (250) vs NBHCX (1000). NBHCX (11.63) and RMFCX (11.47) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. NBHCX (35.04).
| NBHCX | RMFCX | NBHCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.91 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.91 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.892 | 9.596 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 967M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 11.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.83 | 29.27 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.04 | 61.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.83 | 79.21 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement