Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs RMEBX
NBHCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.72
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets967.25M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NBHCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NBHCX (967M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs NBHCX (1.00). NBHCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NBHCX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHCX: RMEBX (250) vs NBHCX (1000). NBHCX (11.63) and RMEBX (11.31) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. NBHCX (35.04).
| NBHCX | RMEBX | NBHCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.07 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.07 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.892 | 9.495 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 967M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.12 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 11.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.83 | 28.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.04 | 60.65 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.83 | 77.57 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement