Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs RMEBX
NBHCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.42
Change-$0.09 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.65M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
NBHCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. NBHCX (940M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: RMEBX (1.16) vs NBHCX (0.95). NBHCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NBHCX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHCX: RMEBX (250) vs NBHCX (1000). NBHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RMEBX (8.54). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. NBHCX (33.59).
| NBHCX | RMEBX | NBHCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.07 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.07 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.315 | 5.923 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 940M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 8.54 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.95 | 27.89 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 58.69 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.87 | 68.22 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers