NBHC
Price
$35.55
Change
+$0.30 (+0.85%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
2 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$22.95
Change
+$0.10 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NBHC vs SBCF

Header iconNBHC vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts NBHC vs SBCFBanner chart's image
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$35.55
Change+$0.30 (+0.85%)
Volume$216.28K
Capitalization1.34B
Seacoast Banking
Price$22.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.44%)
Volume$564.08K
Capitalization2.1B
NBHC vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBHC vs. SBCF commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHC is a Hold and SBCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (NBHC: $35.55 vs. SBCF: $22.95)
Brand notoriety: NBHC and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBHC: 82% vs. SBCF: 112%
Market capitalization -- NBHC: $1.34B vs. SBCF: $2.1B
NBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.34B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NBHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBHC is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBHC is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

NBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.81% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.34B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than NBHC: SBCF (20.13) vs NBHC (9.52). SBCF (-16.042) and NBHC (-16.863) have similar YTD gains . NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. SBCF (168M). SBCF has less debt than NBHC: SBCF (156M) vs NBHC (394M). SBCF has higher revenues than NBHC: SBCF (567M) vs NBHC (420M).
NBHCSBCFNBHC / SBCF
Capitalization1.34B2.1B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.863-16.042105%
P/E Ratio9.5220.1347%
Revenue420M567M74%
Total Cash369M168M220%
Total Debt394M156M253%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBHC vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
NBHC
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4464
SMR RATING
1..100
1514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1856
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBHC's Valuation (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (71). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (64). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (15). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (61). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (56). This means that NBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBHCSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+0.85%
FNB - NBHC
86%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
NWBI - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
ABCB - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
RNST - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
SBCF - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+0.44%
ABCB - SBCF
92%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
BHLB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
SFNC - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
More