NBHC
Price
$39.28
Change
-$0.21 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
93 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$19.04
Change
+$0.69 (+3.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBHC vs PFS

Header iconNBHC vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts NBHC vs PFSBanner chart's image
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$39.28
Change-$0.21 (-0.53%)
Volume$417.82K
Capitalization1.34B
Provident Financial Services
Price$19.04
Change+$0.69 (+3.76%)
Volume$822.93K
Capitalization1.1B
NBHC vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBHC vs. PFS commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHC is a Hold and PFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NBHC: $39.28 vs. PFS: $19.04)
Brand notoriety: NBHC and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBHC: 174% vs. PFS: 127%
Market capitalization -- NBHC: $1.34B vs. PFS: $1.1B
NBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.34B. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

NBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBHC($1.34B) has a higher market cap than PFS($1.1B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than PFS: NBHC (9.52) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 3.589 vs. NBHC (-7.388). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. PFS (189M). NBHC has less debt than PFS: NBHC (394M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than NBHC: PFS (479M) vs NBHC (420M).
NBHCPFSNBHC / PFS
Capitalization1.34B1.1B122%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.3883.589-206%
P/E Ratio9.528.49112%
Revenue420M479M88%
Total Cash369M189M195%
Total Debt394M1.46B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBHC vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
NBHC
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7920
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5048
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5770
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (70) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBHCPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRSGX12.280.21
+1.74%
Harbor Small Cap Growth Admin
CGJIX72.990.37
+0.51%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx I
FEIKX81.230.21
+0.26%
Fidelity Equity-Income K
VREQX10.53-0.01
-0.09%
NYLI CBRE Real Estate Class R6
WAFMX3.80-0.02
-0.52%
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Inv

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with FBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then FBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
-0.53%
FBK - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
PFS - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
ABCB - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FNB - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
FULT - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+3.76%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
HOPE - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
FFBC - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+4.28%
TCBK - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
ABCB - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More