Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHAX vs RMFEX
NBHAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts NBHAX vs RMFEX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income A
Price$14.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.33M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
NBHAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NBHAX (961M). NBHAX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: NBHAX (1.67) vs RMFEX (1.49). NBHAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: NBHAX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). NBHAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHAX (28.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHAX: RMFEX (250) vs NBHAX (1000). NBHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. RMFEX (8.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. NBHAX (30.87).
| NBHAX | RMFEX | NBHAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.084 | 11.638 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 961M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.49 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.79 | 8.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 33.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.87 | 58.84 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.91 | 98.59 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement