Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHAX vs RMFCX
NBHAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NBHAX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income A
Price$14.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets967.25M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NBHAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NBHAX (967M). NBHAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NBHAX (1.70) vs RMFCX (1.27). NBHAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NBHAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NBHAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHAX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHAX: RMFCX (250) vs NBHAX (1000). NBHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. RMFCX (11.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. NBHAX (39.19).
| NBHAX | RMFCX | NBHAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.325 | 9.596 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 967M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.27 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 11.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.05 | 29.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.19 | 61.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.64 | 79.21 | 48% |