Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGUX vs RGAGX
NBGUX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NBGUX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$30.32
Change+$0.35 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NBGUX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGUX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGUX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NBGUX (2.56B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NBGUX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NBGUX (0.00). NBGUX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NBGUX (29 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NBGUX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NBGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NBGUX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. NBGUX (7.94). RGAGX (51.38) and NBGUX (50.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGUX | RGAGX | NBGUX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.30 | 480% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.30 | 480% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.176 | 11.348 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 11.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.05 | 60.98 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.00 | 51.38 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.54 | 89.12 | 66% |