Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGUX vs RGAGX
NBGUX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NBGUX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$31.88
Change+$0.22 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NBGUX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGUX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGUX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NBGUX (2.63B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NBGUX: RGAGX (0.59) vs NBGUX (0.00). NBGUX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NBGUX (29 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NBGUX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NBGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NBGUX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. NBGUX (18.51). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. NBGUX (41.80).
| NBGUX | RGAGX | NBGUX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.30 | 480% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.30 | 480% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.690 | 16.660 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.51 | 22.13 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.93 | 54.30 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.80 | 46.68 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.00 | 103.98 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement