Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGUX vs RGACX
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGUX vs RGACX
Neuberger Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$29.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGUX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGUX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NBGUX (2.63B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGUX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGUX (0.00). NBGUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGUX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NBGUX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBGUX (30.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGUX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. NBGUX (-0.88). NBGUX return over 5 years is better than : 24.27 vs. RGACX (20.41).
| NBGUX | RGACX | NBGUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.93 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.93 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.134 | 8.807 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 5.61 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.26 | 64.57 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.27 | 20.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.36 | 90.45 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers