Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs VIGRX
NBGTX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs VIGRX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$33.63
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$253.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.2B
NBGTX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. VIGRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NBGTX (2.67B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: VIGRX (0.30) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NBGTX (32 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NBGTX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. NBGTX (8.04). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.11 vs. NBGTX (34.86).
| NBGTX | VIGRX | NBGTX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.048 | 19.764 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 18.49 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | 110.82 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | 99.11 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.53 | 349.13 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement