Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGAGX
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$32.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NBGTX (2.63B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAGX (0.60) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. NBGTX (13.21). NBGTX (46.53) and RGAGX (46.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAGX | NBGTX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.491 | 14.500 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 15.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.75 | 43.78 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.53 | 46.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.62 | 90.14 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement