Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGAGX
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$29.61
Change-$0.44 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. NBGTX (2.44B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAGX (0.65) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. NBGTX (6.28). NBGTX (52.12) and RGAGX (51.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAGX | NBGTX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.174 | 5.205 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 7.67 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.70 | 54.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.12 | 51.11 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.13 | 75.62 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement