Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGAGX
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$31.76
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NBGTX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NBGTX (2.59B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. NBGTX (16.08). NBGTX (52.46) and RGAGX (50.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAGX | NBGTX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.593 | 13.508 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 18.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.60 | 59.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.46 | 50.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 89.40 | 57% |