Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGACX
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$33.39
Change-$0.58 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NBGTX (2.71B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). NBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. RGACX (6.14). NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.96 vs. RGACX (34.89).
| NBGTX | RGACX | NBGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.226 | 16.752 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 6.14 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.66 | 61.61 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.96 | 34.89 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.73 | 91.51 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement