Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGACX
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$33.63
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NBGTX (2.67B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). NBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. RGACX (7.35). NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. RGACX (29.99).
| NBGTX | RGACX | NBGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.048 | 19.781 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 7.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | 61.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | 29.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.53 | 91.86 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement