Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGAAX
NBGTX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAAX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$29.61
Change-$0.44 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
Price$68.39
Change-$0.83 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NBGTX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. NBGTX (2.44B). NBGTX pays higher dividends than RGAAX: NBGTX (0.00) vs RGAAX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAAX (23 years). RGAAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NBGTX (1.01). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAAX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAAX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAAX (250). RGAAX (6.54) and NBGTX (6.28) have marching annual gain over last year. NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.12 vs. RGAAX (40.00).
| NBGTX | RGAAX | NBGTX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.38 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.38 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.174 | 4.700 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 6.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.70 | 47.36 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.12 | 40.00 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.13 | 57.62 | 66% |