Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGNX vs WCMLX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGNX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). NBGNX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGNX (0.22) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGNX (37 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGNX (0.99). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NBGNX (23.00). NBGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGNX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. NBGNX (-13.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. NBGNX (-24.13).
| NBGNX | WCMLX | NBGNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.395 | 6.395 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.49B | 47.1M | 18,034% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.03 | 8.52 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.11 | 19.51 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.13 | -5.30 | 455% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers